Skip to content
The Law Offices of James M. GlickCRIMINAL DEFENSE SINCE 1974

SAN BERNARDINO CRIMINAL DEFENSE · SINCE 1974

Violent & Serious Felony Defense in San Bernardino

When the allegations carry lasting consequences, every element, enhancement, and proposed resolution deserves a disciplined defense.

Call (909) 889-1446

Your case is more than the label on the charging document.

A serious felony allegation can put years of your life at stake. It can also create pressure to make decisions before you understand the evidence or the consequences. You need a defense that looks closely at the facts, the legal classification, and the result you are being asked to accept.

James M. Glick has practiced criminal defense since 1974, with a longstanding focus on San Bernardino County. The office handles violent and serious felony matters and offers a place to discuss the allegations without reducing your situation to a headline.

The defense goal should be clear: challenge what the prosecution cannot prove, identify available legal defenses, and evaluate every proposed resolution against the full consequences. Where a negotiated result is appropriate, the question is what it achieves for you—and what it leaves on your record.

“Serious,” “violent,” and “strike” have specific legal meanings.

California law: provisions to discuss with your attorney
Code sectionWhy it matters
Penal Code § 1192.7(c)Defines the statutory list of serious felonies.
Penal Code § 667.5(c)Defines the statutory list of violent felonies. This list overlaps with, but is not identical to, the serious-felony list.
Penal Code § 667(b)–(i)Contains California’s legislative Three Strikes sentencing framework. Application depends on qualifying prior convictions and the current case.
Penal Code § 1170.12Contains a related Three Strikes sentencing framework that also requires case-specific analysis.

A colloquial description of an incident does not determine its statutory classification. The charged subdivision, allegations, prior record, and facts that must be proved can change the analysis. For example, the treatment of a burglary or injury allegation can depend on additional statutory facts. Review the actual charging papers rather than relying on a shorthand label.

Challenge the evidence and the added allegations.

Depending on the case, the defense review may focus on identity, intent, credibility, the sequence of events, the basis for a claimed injury, or whether the evidence supports an asserted weapon allegation. Self-defense and other defenses require careful analysis of the circumstances and the governing instructions.

No added allegation should be treated as established merely because it appears in a complaint. At the same time, a responsible defense assessment must account for evidence that increases risk. Preparation and candor belong together.

Build the discussion around your real priorities.

Tell the office about custody status, the next hearing, employment, dependents, and any existing orders. Bring the complaint or information, release paperwork, and available records of prior cases. Ask how the scope of representation, investigation, fees, and communication would be handled.

A plea that appears attractive in the short term may carry consequences for later cases or other parts of life. Ask for those consequences to be explained before making a decision. Potential resolutions depend on the law, the evidence, and the court—not a blanket assurance that a strike will be removed.

Common serious felony questions

Is every felony a strike?

No. Strike analysis concerns qualifying serious or violent felony convictions and the applicable sentencing statutes. The offense, subdivision, findings, and prior record must be examined.

Does an allegation of violence make the case a statutory violent felony?

Not automatically. The statutory list and any required facts control. “Serious” and “violent” are legal classifications, not interchangeable descriptions.

Can a strike allegation or enhancement be challenged?

There may be factual, legal, or discretionary issues to evaluate. What can be challenged or dismissed depends on the particular allegation and governing law; relief is not automatic.

Serious allegations deserve serious preparation.

Call (909) 889-1446 to discuss the charges, any alleged strike priors, and the next hearing. Ask for a clear assessment of the risks and available defense paths.

Call the Office

← Explore all practice areas

Contact James M. Glick

Tell us how to reach you and give a brief description of your issue.

Please keep your message brief and avoid sensitive case details. Contacting the office does not by itself establish an attorney-client relationship.

Your inquiry will be submitted to the office through the hosted contact form.

Prefer to call? (909) 889-1446